I believe in nothing
not in some nihilistic sense
But in the sense that I hold no belief to be absolute. I have always questioned and doubted and sought and tried to keep approaching deeper and higher into Truth
Once I truly believed in nothing, then I started believing in everything
Because in a Reality of pure consciousness and ideas, everything that exists as an idea actually exists.
So then everything is true, is real, exists….
And then my belief in nothing. and my belief in everything became consummated in the belief of knowing
transcending belief,
“My technique, which I recommend to you, is, don’t believe anything. If you believe in something, you are automatically precluded from believing its opposite” - Terrence McKenna“Under the Teaching Tree“].
“In order to be free I must not believe anything,” he said. “Then all things can be freely commanded in the mind” [“Bootstrapping Ourselves“].
“I once said to the mushroom: Why me? Why are you telling me all this stuff? And it without hesitation said ‘because you don’t believe anything.’” - TM
“People ask me if I believe in the 2012 prediction,” he said in an interview in 1996. “I don’t believe in anything. My anti-ideological stance makes it very important to believe nothing.”
“I have been vehemently accused by people who didn’t understand me of not believing in anything. I don’t believe in anything. This is not a statement of existential hopelessness for which you should light a candle for me at night. It’s a strategy for not getting bogged down in some weird trip. After all, what is the basis for believing anything? I mean, you have to understand: You’re a monkey. In some kind of a biological situation where everything has been evolved to serve the economy of survival—this is not a philosophy course. So belief is a curious reaction to the present at hand. It isn’t to be believed, it’s to be dealt with—experienced and modeled [“Gathering Momentum for a Leap“].
Epistemological Anarchy
epistemological anarchy “The other meaning of "authority", which refers to expertise, is problematic in the sense that this kind of "authority" functions as a gatekeeper of the possible. Researcher James Corbett has introduced a new term to distinguish this type of "authority": expertology. By relying on "authorities" of any kind (whether experts on a particular subject or people who believe they have rights that others don't), we get into such binds as a language based on "subject-verb-object" and entrap ourselves in all manner of disempowering belief systems. Anarchist philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend already figured this out, calling the idea epistemological anarchy. Feyerabend "felt the exclusive dominance of science as a means of directing society was authoritarian and ungrounded" — and this is exactly what we are also pointing out.””
- The Biggest Picture
Library of Light Edition 1.0 — Last revised: June 2026